Complete ICD-10-CM coding and documentation guide for Proteus mirabilis Infection. Includes clinical validation requirements, documentation requirements, and coding pitfalls.
Also known as:
Complete code families applicable to Proteus mirabilis Infection
Bacterial and viral infectious agents
Includes codes for identifying infectious agents as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere.
Other bacterial sepsis
Includes codes for sepsis due to various bacterial agents, including Proteus mirabilis.
Other diseases of the urinary system
Primary range for urinary tract infections, which can be caused by Proteus mirabilis.
Compare key differences between these codes to ensure accurate selection
Code | Description | When to Use | Key Documentation |
---|---|---|---|
B96.4 | Proteus (mirabilis) as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere | Use as an additional code to identify Proteus mirabilis as the causative organism. |
|
N39.0 | Urinary tract infection, site not specified | Use as the primary code for uncomplicated UTI caused by Proteus mirabilis. |
|
A41.89 | Other specified sepsis | Use for sepsis due to Proteus mirabilis when specified in documentation. |
|
Always review the patient's clinical documentation thoroughly. When in doubt, choose the more specific code and ensure documentation supports it.
Essential facts and insights about Proteus mirabilis Infection
Use as the primary code for uncomplicated UTI caused by Proteus mirabilis.
Document symptoms and culture results clearly.
Use for sepsis due to Proteus mirabilis when specified in documentation.
Ensure documentation of organism and sepsis criteria.
Additional codes that should be used in conjunction with the main diagnosis codes when applicable.
Urinary tract infection, site not specified
N39.0Alternative codes to consider when ruling out similar conditions to the primary diagnosis.
Pseudomonas (aeruginosa) as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere
B96.5Acute pyelonephritis
N10Sepsis due to gram-negative organisms
A41.5Avoid these common documentation and coding issues when documenting Proteus mirabilis Infection to ensure proper reimbursement, maintain compliance, and reduce audit risk. These guidelines are particularly important when using ICD-10 code B96.4.
Clinical: May lead to inappropriate antibiotic selection., Regulatory: Non-compliance with coding standards., Financial: Potential for claim denials due to lack of specificity.
Ensure lab results are reviewed and documented., Educate staff on the importance of organism specification.
Reimbursement: Incorrect sequencing can lead to claim denials., Compliance: Non-compliance with ICD-10 coding guidelines., Data Quality: Inaccurate data representation of infection etiology.
Always use B96.4 as a secondary code with a primary infection code.
Reimbursement: Potential for incorrect DRG assignment., Compliance: Fails to meet coding guidelines for specificity., Data Quality: Incomplete clinical data for infection tracking.
Ensure documentation specifies the infection site and organism.
Failure to document the specific organism can lead to audit issues.
Implement regular training on documentation requirements.
Documentation errors, coding pitfalls, and audit risks are interconnected aspects of medical coding and billing. Addressing all three areas helps ensure accurate coding, optimal reimbursement, and regulatory compliance.
Common questions about ICD-10 coding for Proteus mirabilis Infection, with expert answers to help guide accurate code selection and documentation.
Use these documentation templates to ensure complete and accurate documentation for Proteus mirabilis Infection. These templates include all required elements for proper coding and billing.
Need help with ICD-10 coding for Proteus mirabilis Infection? Ask your questions below.