Back to HomeBeta

ICD-10 Coding for Retinitis Pigmentosa(H35.52)

Complete ICD-10-CM coding and documentation guide for Retinitis Pigmentosa. Includes clinical validation requirements, documentation requirements, and coding pitfalls.

Also known as:

RPPigmentary Retinal Dystrophy

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to Retinitis Pigmentosa

H35.50-H35.59Primary Range

Hereditary retinal dystrophies

This range includes codes for various hereditary retinal dystrophies, with H35.52 specifically for retinitis pigmentosa.

Key Information: ICD-10 code for retinitis pigmentosa

Essential facts and insights about Retinitis Pigmentosa

The ICD-10 code for retinitis pigmentosa is H35.52, used for confirmed cases.

Primary ICD-10-CM Code for retinitis pigmentosa

Pigmentary retinal dystrophy
Billable Code

Decision Criteria

clinical Criteria

  • Confirmed genetic mutation associated with RP

documentation Criteria

  • Detailed fundoscopic findings and ERG results

Applicable To

  • Retinitis pigmentosa
  • Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa
  • Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa

Excludes

  • Other hereditary retinal dystrophies (H35.50)

Clinical Validation Requirements

  • Electroretinography (ERG) showing reduced rod responses
  • Genetic testing confirming pathogenic variants
  • Fundoscopic findings of bone spicule pigmentation

Code-Specific Risks

  • Misuse for suspected cases without confirmation
  • Omitting necessary ancillary codes for symptoms

Coding Notes

  • Ensure genetic confirmation or clinical validation before using H35.52.

Ancillary Codes

Additional codes that should be used in conjunction with the main diagnosis codes when applicable.

Night blindness

H53.60
Use for documenting nyctalopia associated with RP.

Other peripheral vision loss

H53.459
Use for documenting peripheral vision loss in RP.

Differential Codes

Alternative codes to consider when ruling out similar conditions to the primary diagnosis.

Unspecified hereditary retinal dystrophy

H35.50
Use H35.50 for cases where specific dystrophy type is not determined.

Documentation & Coding Risks

Avoid these common documentation and coding issues when documenting Retinitis Pigmentosa to ensure proper reimbursement, maintain compliance, and reduce audit risk. These guidelines are particularly important when using ICD-10 code H35.52.

Impact

Clinical: Inaccurate diagnosis and treatment planning., Regulatory: Non-compliance with documentation standards., Financial: Potential claim denials due to insufficient documentation.

Mitigation Strategy

Ensure genetic test results are included in all RP diagnoses., Regular audits of patient records.

Impact

Reimbursement: Incorrect coding may lead to denied claims., Compliance: Non-compliance with coding standards., Data Quality: Inaccurate data on patient records.

Mitigation Strategy

Use symptom codes until RP is confirmed by genetic or clinical tests.

Impact

High risk of audit if H35.52 is used without genetic or clinical confirmation.

Mitigation Strategy

Require documentation of genetic testing or ERG results before coding.

Documentation errors, coding pitfalls, and audit risks are interconnected aspects of medical coding and billing. Addressing all three areas helps ensure accurate coding, optimal reimbursement, and regulatory compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ICD-10 coding for Retinitis Pigmentosa, with expert answers to help guide accurate code selection and documentation.

Documentation Templates for Retinitis Pigmentosa

Use these documentation templates to ensure complete and accurate documentation for Retinitis Pigmentosa. These templates include all required elements for proper coding and billing.

Ophthalmology Progress Note for RP

Specialty: Ophthalmology

Required Elements

  • Patient history
  • Fundoscopic findings
  • ERG results
  • Genetic testing results

Example Documentation

Assessment: Retinitis pigmentosa confirmed by ERG and genetic testing. Plan: Monitor progression, consider low vision aids.

Examples: Poor vs. Good Documentation

Poor Documentation Example
Patient has RP.
Good Documentation Example
Confirmed autosomal recessive RP via genetic testing (RPE65 c.152G>A homozygous), ERG shows non-recordable scotopic responses.
Explanation
The good example provides specific genetic and clinical findings, enhancing documentation quality.

Need help with ICD-10 coding for Retinitis Pigmentosa? Ask your questions below.

Ask about any ICD-10 CM code, or paste a medical note

We build tools for
clinician happiness.

Learn More at Freed.ai
Back to HomeBeta

Built by Freed

Try Freed for free for 7 days.

Learn more